Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 593203
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:49:15+00:00 2026-05-13T15:49:15+00:00

I like to use git add –patch (and more recently, git add -i) to

  • 0

I like to use git add –patch (and more recently, git add -i) to untangle my commits as well as verify that what I’m committing is good to go.

Once in a while I’ll come across a hunk that might be an error logging statement, an extra newline (usually from erasing the aforementioned logging statement) – something that I’d actually rather remove entirely.

I don’t want to stage and I’d also like to simply delete the hunk in question while it’s right there in front me of (rather than jumping back to my editor and trying again). I want to apply the change against my working file as well.

Is there a way to do this?


What I’ve considered is using the edit hunk functionality.

This, in conjunction with the suggestion hash made below gets me a slightly nicer workflow than I have now.

I agree that it’s a violation of the git add‘s separation of concerns. OTOH it would just be so convenient ;P I sound like my boss 😉

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:49:16+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:49 pm

    Better than using reset hard HEAD, after committing all your valid hunks, you can just git checkout the file to reset it to what’s recorded in the current branch. That way it doesn’t affect any other files.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 316k
  • Answers 316k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer CR = 0x0D or 13 LF = 0x0A or 10 May 13, 2026 at 11:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not positive about what the error might be, but… May 13, 2026 at 11:34 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not sure if this is exactly the same issue,… May 13, 2026 at 11:34 pm

Related Questions

After git clone, the config in the new repo looks like: remote.origin.url=<some url> remote.origin.fetch=+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
I have a new project starting up, and I was planning to use git
I've got a contract to write part of a program. The person writing the
After I have moved a file in git (using git mv ), looking at
I would like to be able to use ediff with git mergetool. I found

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.