Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3997656
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T07:25:42+00:00 2026-05-20T07:25:42+00:00

I love how inarray, searchs an array without looping, but it only does exact/precise

  • 0

I love how inarray, searchs an array without looping, but it only does exact/precise matches, where if i used the .match, i can do partial matches, but that requires a loop.

Is there any way to search an array for partial matches, without looping?

There are 2 arrays, 1 to be searched for, the 2nd to replace the text/values if a partial or full match is found in the 1st.

The goal is to have the fastest way to search the array for partial or full matches.

Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T07:25:43+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:25 am

    Well, .inArray() of course loops over the Array if Array.prototype.indexOf() is not available:

    snippet

    inArray: function( elem, array ) {
        if ( array.indexOf ) {
            return array.indexOf( elem );
        }
    
        for ( var i = 0, length = array.length; i < length; i++ ) {
            if ( array[ i ] === elem ) {
                return i;
            }
        }
    
        return -1;
    },
    

    snippet

    If you just want to know whether or not an entry is contained by an Array, you may just want to .join() it and use the String.prototype.indexOf().

    This of course, can’t return an index anymore. So you would need to write your own logic. Could be done easily by modifying the above code. For instance:

    Array.prototype.ourIndexOf = function(v) {
        for ( var i = 0, length = this.length; i < length; i++ ) {
           if ( typeof this[i] === 'string' && this[i].indexOf(v) > -1 ) {
                return i;
           }
        }
        return -1;
    };
    
    ['Foobar', 'baseball', 'test123'].ourIndexOf('base') // === 1
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

How can I see in Java if an Object is an array without using
I love having a book in front of me, but right now I can't
I love vim and the speed it gives me. But sometimes, my fingers are
I love the way I can profile a Java/.Net app to find performance bottlenecks
I love scaffolding and it extremely helpful for prototyping. But Should we use scaffolding
I love programming with .NET, especially C# 3.0, .NET 3.5 and WPF. But what
I love doctests, it is the only testing framwork I use, because it is
I love Eclipse's quickfixes. I use the assign parameter to new field often, but
I am looping through an array of english phrases, and if i find a
I love the idea of Qt, however I use it not only for open

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.