Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 956677
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T00:34:40+00:00 2026-05-16T00:34:40+00:00

I love new Rail 3! The new query syntax is so awesome: users =

  • 0

I love new Rail 3!

The new query syntax is so awesome:

users = User.where(:name => 'Bob', :last_name => 'Brown')

But when we need to do something like

SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Age >= const AND Money > const2

We have to use

users = User.where('Age >= ? and money > ?', const, const2)

Which is not very cool. The following query is not safe because of SQL injection:

users = User.where('Age >= #{const} and money > #{const2}')

I like the C#/LINQ version

var users = DB.Where(u => u.Age >= const && u.Money > const2);

Is there a way to do something like that in Rails?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T00:34:41+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:34 am

    The new querying with rails isn’t vulnerable to SQL injection. Any quotes in the argument are escaped.

    Rails 3 AR has gained the delayed execution that LINQ has had for a while. This lets you chain any of the query methods. The only time you have to put 2 or more parts into a where is when you want an OR.

    That aside, there are many different ways to do your query.

    Users.where('age >= ?', age).where('money > ?', money)
    Users.where('age >= ? and money > ?', age, money)
    
    class User < ActiveRecord::Base
      scope :aged, lambda { |age| where('age >= ?', age) }
      scope :enough_money, lambda { |money| where('money > ?', money) }
    
      scope :can_admit, lambda { |age, money| aged(age).enough_money(money) }
    end
    
    Users.aged(18).enough_money(200)
    Users.can_admit(18, 200)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.