Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6950697
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T14:07:28+00:00 2026-05-27T14:07:28+00:00

I made a standard Active::Record class with a user_id field on it, and sure

  • 0

I made a standard Active::Record class with a user_id field on it, and sure enough, the requirements changed. Turns out I needed to nix the ‘user_id’ column, and put on an ’email’ column instead. I figured I would just manually replace the field in the migration file and then do a quick ‘rake db:migrate down/up’ on that version to make the update. I even ended up updating db/schema.rb as well.

No Dice:

 Failure/Error: ss = Factory(:model)
 undefined method `email=' for #<Model:0xb2cc288>

I can use email getter/setter methods in the console, or in the service fine — but factory girl doesn’t seem to get the hint. Is it caching a method list somewhere? (Hint: mysql table looks good too)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T14:07:28+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:07 pm

    Firstly, in the future, try really hard not to change existing migration files. You will mess up more than just FactoryGirl, namely you will mess up your teammates’ setups. Requirements change and that’s OK, you just make a new migration that drops the user_id column and adds an e-mail column. This way, the evolution of the data model will be recorded in the migrations.

    For your specific problem, though, you probably want to run rake db:test:prepare or, if that doesn’t work, drop your test database completely and rebuild it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Since I'm sure many people have different standard, I've made this post a community
I'm not sure if these are custom made buttons or if they are standard,
So I made a standard swing application in Netbeans 6.8 but I can't find
I made a Java Applet with some Standard GUI Components on it. I used
I made a class from Linq to SQL Clasees with VS 2008 SP1 Framework
I made a class that derives from Component: public class MyComponent: System.ComponentModel.Component { }
in an application I made that uses AWT standard classes, a call to Color
I've made an ASP.NET web form that uses the standard ASP.NET validation. I'd like
I compiled and installed Qt for Embedded Linux and made sure to use -qt-gfx-vnc
Now that the new c++11 standard has made changes in how sequence points are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.