Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 778833
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T19:49:46+00:00 2026-05-14T19:49:46+00:00

I made the following function in SQL Server 2008 earlier this week that takes

  • 0

I made the following function in SQL Server 2008 earlier this week that takes two parameters and uses them to select a column of “detail” records and returns them as a single varchar list of comma separated values. Now that I get to thinking about it, I would like to take this table and application-specific function and make it more generic.

I am not well-versed in defining SQL functions, as this is my first. How can I change this function to accept a single “column” worth of data, so that I can use it in a more generic way?

Instead of calling:

SELECT ejc_concatFormDetails(formuid, categoryName)

I would like to make it work like:

SELECT concatColumnValues(SELECT someColumn FROM SomeTable)

Here is my function definition:

FUNCTION [DNet].[ejc_concatFormDetails](@formuid AS int, @category as VARCHAR(75))
RETURNS VARCHAR(1000) AS
BEGIN
 DECLARE @returnData VARCHAR(1000)
 DECLARE @currentData VARCHAR(75)
 DECLARE dataCursor CURSOR FAST_FORWARD FOR
  SELECT data FROM DNet.ejc_FormDetails WHERE formuid = @formuid AND category = @category

 SET @returnData = ''

 OPEN dataCursor

 FETCH NEXT FROM dataCursor INTO @currentData
 WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)
 BEGIN
  SET @returnData = @returnData + ', ' + @currentData
  FETCH NEXT FROM dataCursor INTO @currentData
 END

 CLOSE dataCursor
 DEALLOCATE dataCursor

 RETURN SUBSTRING(@returnData,3,1000)
END

As you can see, I am selecting the column data within my function and then looping over the results with a cursor to build my comma separated varchar.

How can I alter this to accept a single parameter that is a result set and then access that result set with a cursor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T19:49:47+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 7:49 pm

    You can use table-valued parameters:

    CREATE FUNCTION MyFunction(
        @Data AS TABLE (
            Column1 int,
            Column2 nvarchar(50),
            Column3 datetime
        )
    )
    RETURNS NVARCHAR(MAX)
    AS BEGIN
        /* here you can do what you want */
    END
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have an application that is made up of the following: A central database
I have roughly the following code. Could this be made nicer or more efficient?
While discussing a Java synchronization question , someone made a comment that the following
I made a class from Linq to SQL Clasees with VS 2008 SP1 Framework
I am currently doing a code review and the following code made me jump.
I made a class that derives from Component: public class MyComponent: System.ComponentModel.Component { }
Made solution change: I am trying to display a html table of data.. In
I made a view to abstract columns of different tables and pre-filter and pre-sort
I made a Java Applet with some Standard GUI Components on it. I used
I made a discovery some time back. Just follow these steps: Create a .doc/.xls/.ppt

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.