Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 819671
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:20:57+00:00 2026-05-15T02:20:57+00:00

I might be doing this wrong, if I am, let me know, but I’m

  • 0

I might be doing this wrong, if I am, let me know, but I’m curious if the following is possible:

I have a class that holds a number of dictionaries, each of which pairs names to a different set of objects of a given class. For example:

items = {"ball" : ItemInstance1, "sword" : ItemInstance2}
people = {"Jerry" : PersonInstance1, "Bob" : PersonInstance2, "Jill" : PersonInstance3}

My class would then hold the current items and people that are availible, and these would be subject to change as the state changes:

Class State:
    def __init__(self, items, people):
        self.items = items
        self.people = people

I would like to define a iter() and next() method such that it iterates through all of the values in its attributes. My first question is whether or not this is possible. If it is, will it be able to support a situation as follows:

I define items and people as above then:

state = State(items, people)
for names, thing in state:
    print name + " is " + thing.color

items[cheese] = ItemInstance3
for names, thing in state:
    print name + " weighs " + thing.weight

While I feel like this would be usefull in the code I have, I don’t know if it’s either possible or the right approach. Everything I’ve read about user defined iterators has suggested that each instance of them is one use only.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:20:58+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:20 am

    If I understand you question correctly then adding the following method to your class should do it:

    def __iter__(self):
        import itertools
        return itertools.chain(self.items.itervalues(), self.people.itervalues())
    

    This chains together two iterators, and the ones chosen here are for the values of items and the values of people.

    To make your later code work though, you’ll want to iterate over the items – the key-value pairs. In which case this would do it:

    def __iter__(self):
        import itertools
        return itertools.chain(self.items.iteritems(), self.people.iteritems())
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Update: I updated this after doing some digging and realizing that this might be
That might be a naive git question but here it is: Before doing a
Let's say I have the following class structure: class Car; class FooCar : public
I might be doing this the wrong way when I set up the tables?
I'm new to Java Web Services, so I might be doing things wrong. I'm
I can't see what I'm doing wrong. I think it might be one of
Might be a bit of noob question but it's something that's been getting me
So im trying to do something that might not be possible. I want to
i have an xml file that looks something like this <library> <book name=ABC> <chapter
This might be a god awful question but I'm not sure why it won't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.