Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3632300
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T00:30:29+00:00 2026-05-19T00:30:29+00:00

I need a more-efficient way to pass the params hash to a named route,

  • 0

I need a more-efficient way to pass the params hash to a named route, including the ability to add/remove/modify a key/value pair.

Adding a key (the :company symbol), while preserving the remainder of the params hash (manually specify each symbol/value):

# adds the company filter
link_to_unless params[:company]==company, company, jobs_path(:company=>company, :posted=>params[:posted],:sort=>params[:sort],:dir=>params[:dir])

Removing a key (eliminates the :company symbol), while preserving the remainder of the params hash (manually specify each symbol/value):

# create a link that removes the company filter
link_to_unless_current 'x', jobs_path(:posted=>params[:posted],:sort=>params[:sort],:dir=>params[:dir])

I thought of just passing the params hash directly, but that throws an exception:

link_to_unless params[:company]==company, company, jobs_path( params )

I’m hoping for some DRYer alternatives.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T00:30:30+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 12:30 am

    Refactored the helper function:

    def options(hash)
        o={:employer=>params[:employer],:location=>params[:location],:posted=>params[:posted],:starting=>params[:starting],:sort=>params[:sort],:dir=>params[:dir],:fav=>params[:fav]}
        # add the contents of hash, overwriting entries with duplicate keys 
        o.merge!(hash)
    end
    

    Refactored the view code to pass hash instead of key/value pair; greater flexibility:

    <%= link_to_unless params[:employer]==employer, employer, jobs_path( options({:employer=>employer}) ) %>
    

    and

    <%= link_to_unless_current '✗', jobs_path( options({:employer=>nil}) ) %>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need a more efficient way of producing multiple files from my data group.
I'm looking for a more efficient way of completing this task. I need to
The DataReader is more efficient than a DataTable if you only need to show
I'm trying to write more efficient code in a C program, and I need
Is there a better, more efficient way to write this code? It's a make
Is there a more efficient way to break the data in a byte array
I was wondering if there is a more efficient way of doing what I
Is there a better (more efficient) way to write this query? It seems like
Is there a faster or more efficient way to select the next record than
I need an efficient way to select all articles with at least tags Tag1

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.