Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6360205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T23:37:08+00:00 2026-05-24T23:37:08+00:00

I need a working code for a function that will return a random string

  • 0

I need a working code for a function that will return a random string with a random length.

What I want to do would be better described by the following code.

char *getRandomString()
{
    char word[random-length];
    // ...instructions that will fill word with random characters.
    return word;
}
void main()
{
    char *string = getRandomString();
    printf("Random string is: %s\n", string);
}

For this, I am strictly forbidden to use any other include than stdio.h.
Edit: This project will be adapted to be compiled for a PIC Microcontroller, hence I cannot use malloc() or such stuff.
The reason why I use stdio.h here, is for me to be able to inspect the output using GCC.

Currently, this code gives this error.-
“warning: function returns address of local variable [enabled by default]”

Then, I thought this could work.-

char *getRandomString(char *string)
{
    char word[random-length];
    // ...instructions that will fill word with random characters.
    string = word;
    return string;
}
void main()
{
    char *string = getRandomString(string);
    printf("Random string is: %s\n", string);
}

But it only prints a bunch of nonsense characters.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T23:37:08+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 11:37 pm

    There are three common ways to do this.

    1. Have the caller pass in a pointer to (the first element of) an array into which the data is to be stored, along with a length parameter. If the string to be returned is bigger than the passed-in length, it’s an error; you need to decide how to deal with it. (You could truncate the result, or you could return a null pointer. Either way, the caller has to be able to deal with it.)

    2. Return a pointer to a newly allocated object, making it the caller’s responsibility to call free when done. Probably return a null pointer if malloc() fails (this is always a possibility, and you should always check for it). Since malloc and free are declared in <stdlib.h> this doesn’t meet your (artificial) requirements.

    3. Return a pointer to (the first element of) a static array. This avoids the error of returning a pointer to a locally allocated object, but it has its own drawbacks. It means that later calls will clobber the original result, and it imposes a fixed maximum size.

    None if these is an ideal solution.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.