Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 597803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:19:12+00:00 2026-05-13T16:19:12+00:00

I need binary combinators of the type (a -> Bool) -> (a -> Bool)

  • 0

I need binary combinators of the type

(a -> Bool) -> (a -> Bool) -> a -> Bool

or maybe

[a -> Bool] -> a -> Bool

(though this would just be the foldr1 of the first, and I usually only need to combine two boolean functions.)

Are these built-in?


If not, the implementation is simple:

both f g x = f x && g x
either f g x = f x || g x

or perhaps

allF fs x = foldr (\ f b -> b && f x) True fs
anyF fs x = foldr (\ f b -> b || f x) False fs

Hoogle turns up nothing, but sometimes its search doesn’t generalise properly. Any idea if these are built-in? Can they be built from pieces of an existing library?

If these aren’t built-in, you might suggest new names, because these names are pretty bad. In fact that’s the main reason I hope that they are built-in.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:19:12+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:19 pm

    Control.Monad defines an instance Monad ((->) r), so

    ghci> :m Control.Monad
    ghci> :t liftM2 (&&)
    liftM2 (&&) :: (Monad m) => m Bool -> m Bool -> m Bool
    ghci> liftM2 (&&) (5 <) (< 10) 8
    True
    

    You could do the same with Control.Applicative.liftA2.


    Not to seriously suggest it, but…

    ghci> :t (. flip ($)) . flip all
    (. flip ($)) . flip all :: [a -> Bool] -> a -> Bool
    ghci> :t (. flip ($)) . flip any
    (. flip ($)) . flip any :: [a -> Bool] -> a -> Bool
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 365k
  • Answers 365k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use the data in the /proc filesystem to… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Do you still get the error when you use a… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can use array_chunk to create a single array comprised… May 14, 2026 at 3:57 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.