Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8008185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T18:03:46+00:00 2026-06-04T18:03:46+00:00

I need check with junit that method of nested anonymous class invoked. But this

  • 0

I need check with junit that method of nested anonymous class invoked. But this class is private. Does there exist a way to test it without changing visiblity and logic of work? It may be that a common way exists to resolve similar problems?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T18:03:48+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 6:03 pm

    The fact that the class is private or anonymous means that the implementation details are private. In general, your tests should not be depending upon implementation details, but should be testing behaviour, not the specific implementation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to check in some fast way if there is any text nodes
I need to check a directory to see if there are any files whose
I need to check the duration of a group of audio files. Is there
I have a method which is used to check if the given class is
i want something like this the user enter a website link i need check
I need to check data update periodly, but the data is only updating during
I need to check the connection with the function http://php.net/manual/en/function.ssh2-connect.php But if I made
I need to check the RequestType of an HttpRequest in ASP.NET (or WebRequest.Method ).
I need to cover some tests with JUnit. My method returns java.io.File. What are
I need to check that my asp.net listbox is not empty when I submit

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.