Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 823445
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:56:55+00:00 2026-05-15T02:56:55+00:00

I need help re-factoring this legacy LINQ-SQL code which is generating around 100 update

  • 0

I need help re-factoring this legacy LINQ-SQL code which is generating around 100 update statements.

I’ll keep playing around with the best solution, but would appreciate some ideas/past experience with this issue.

Here’s my code:

List<Foo> foos;
int userId = 123;

using (DataClassesDataContext db = new FooDatabase())
{
     foos = (from f in db.FooBars
             where f.UserId = userId
             select f).ToList();

     foreach (FooBar fooBar in foos)
     {
         fooBar.IsFoo = false;
     }

     db.SubmitChanges()
}

Essentially i want to update the IsFoo field to false for all records that have a particular UserId value.

Whats happening is the .ToList() is firing off a query to get all the FooBars for a particular user, then for each Foo object, its executing an UPDATE statement updating the IsFoo property.

Can the above code be re-factored to one single UPDATE statement?

Ideally, the only SQL i want fired is the below:

UPDATE FooBars
SET    IsFoo = FALSE
WHERE  UserId = 123

EDIT

Ok so looks like it cant be done without using db.ExecuteCommand.

Grr…!

What i’ll probably end up doing is creating another extension method for the DLINQ namespace. Still require some hardcoding (ie writing “WHERE” and “UPDATE”), but at least it hides most of the implementation details away from the actual LINQ query syntax.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:56:56+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:56 am

    Check DataClassesDataContext.ExecuteCommand…

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 420k
  • Answers 420k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try to redirect whatever the response is: success: function(data) {… May 15, 2026 at 10:35 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The common way to do it would be to send… May 15, 2026 at 10:35 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer My shot in the dark is that this is because… May 15, 2026 at 10:35 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.