Home/ Questions/Q 8826823
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-14T07:14:11+00:00

I need some help here. Here is part of my data model: I have

  • 0

I need some help here. Here is part of my data model:
enter image description here

I have folder, but I also want to have some folders that I can access easily without searching each time. So I made a default folders entity and I want a relationship to a certain folder.

However, it’s complaining that it wants a reverse relationship. I don’t see how that would work in this case. Any ideas?

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Ramy’s answer is correct, you don’t have to define an inverse relationship. I just want to point out an alternative:

    You can define multiple inverse relationships from Folder to DefaultFolders, e.g.

    • defAccount as inverse relationship to account,
    • defArchive as inverse relationship to archive,
    • … and so on.

    Disadvantage: The Folder records are larger, so your database needs more space.

    Advantage: If you define the “Delete Rule” as “Nullify” for these inverse relationships, then the account, archive, … properties in DefaultFolders will be set to nil automatically if the corresponding Folder is deleted.

    • 0