Home/ Questions/Q 963497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-16T01:40:47+00:00

I need some help in explaining this behavior in SQL Server 2008. I have

  • 0

I need some help in explaining this behavior in SQL Server 2008. I have a simple c++ program that is running a query in a loop. Here is the pseudocode of the program.

myTempid = 0;

while (1) {
  execQuery(select a.id 
             from a,b,c,d 
            where a.id = b.id 
              and b.id = c.id 
              and c.id = d.id 
              and id.id = myTempID)
}

Here are some facts

  1. a,b,c are empty tables
  2. d has about 5500 rows

The query starts out taking ‘0msec’ (i can see this from the profiler); but then after X number of iterations; it jumps to about 60msec and stays there. The X is variant; sometimes its 100.. sometimes 200. The weird thing is that once it makes the jump from 0 to 60msec; it just stays there no matter the myID.

To me it sounds like SQL Server is somehow ‘de-caching’ the query plan?? Does this make sense to anyone

Thanks!

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The results from SQL Profiler can by tricky to interpret.

    The time shown for a command includes the time for the record set to be delivered to the client. To see this, create a SELECT statement that returns at least a million rows. Run these tests is SQL Management Studio and run SQL Profiler to trace the results.

    First run, send the SQL results to a temporary table (should take a second or so). Second run, send the the SQL results to the Results window (should take a few seconds). Note the run time shown in SSMS. Then note the time reported by SQL Profiler.

    You should see that the the time SSMS takes to read the record set, format the results, and display them to Result window increases the duration that is reported for the query.

    After all that, I’m saying that when you are running the query from your application, at that level of precision (60 ms), you cannot tell where the slow down is coming from: database, network, or application, just from the reported duration.

    You should create a test script and run the query in SSMS and see if the query time degrades when your application is not part of the loop.

    SQL Profiler 2008 records duration in microseconds, but only displays it in milliseconds; so rounding is an issue. Save the trace as a Trace Table and look at results in the Duration column to see the microseconds. If the problem is within SQL Server, you may see the duration increasing over time.

    You can also have the Profiler return the execution plan. You can look at the execution plan before and after the duration increases and see if the execution plan is changing.

    • 0