Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3459986
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T10:10:29+00:00 2026-05-18T10:10:29+00:00

I need the internal implementation of HashTable in java code. Further can you explain

  • 0

I need the internal implementation of HashTable in java code. Further can you explain me with Additional comments in code as how does it work.

I just have some basic knowledge on load factor and capacity used in HashTable where load factor is 0.75. Could you explain with a brief example.

I’m stuck up with this for a long time.

1> Why is load factor 0.75 for hashtable and not some other value which is varying. Quite strange Please clarify.

2> Why don’t we have load factor for HashMap ?
I don’t want the existing code. Some one who has written a better code than what is actually written

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T10:10:29+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 10:10 am

    Why dont we have load factor for HashMap ?

    We do – see HashMap(int initialCapacity, float loadFactor)

    Why is load factor 0.75 for hashtable and not some other value which is varying.

    1. The load factor for a Hashtable is a tunable parameter.

    2. The javadoc for HashMaps says this about the 0.75 value.

    “As a general rule, the default load factor (.75) offers a good tradeoff between time and space costs. Higher values decrease the space overhead but increase the lookup cost (reflected in most of the operations of the HashMap class, including get and put).”

    I understand that the number was determined by empirical testing rather than by theoretical analysis. (A thorough theoretical analysis would be difficult. However, a load factor of 0.75 combined with a good hash function is probably sufficient to keep hash chains down to 1 or 2 in the vast majority of cases, and that results in fast average lookup times.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.