Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 520707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T08:10:24+00:00 2026-05-13T08:10:24+00:00

I need to convert an integral type which contains an address to the actual

  • 0

I need to convert an integral type which contains an address to the actual pointer type. I could use reinterpret_cast as follows:

MyClass *mc1 = reinterpret_cast<MyClass*>(the_integer);

However, this does not perform any run-time checks to see if the address in question actually holds a MyClass object. I want to know if there is any benefit in first converting to a void* (using reinterpret_cast) and then using dynamic_cast on the result. Like this:

void *p = reinterpret_cast<void*>(the_integer);
MyClass *mc1 = dynamic_cast<MyClass*>(p);
assert(mc1 != NULL);

Is there any advantage in using the second method?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T08:10:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:10 am

    Type checking on dynamic_cast is implemented in different ways by different C++ implementations; if you want an answer for your specific implementation you should mention what implementation you are using. The only way to answer the question in general is to refer to ISO standard C++.

    By my reading of the standard, calling dynamic_cast on a void pointer is illegal:

    dynamic_cast<T>(v)
    

    “If T is a pointer type, v shall be an rvalue of a pointer to complete class type”

    (from 5.2.7.2 of the ISO C++ standard). void is not a complete class type, so the expression is illegal.

    Interestingly, the type being cast to is allowed to be a void pointer, i.e.

    void * foo = dynamic_cast<void *>(some_pointer);
    

    In this case, the dynamic_cast always succeeds, and the resultant value is a pointer to the most-derived object pointed to by v.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to convert full state name to its official state address code. For
I need to convert hierarchical data (AVRO data, which boils down to JSON) into
I need to convert keys from type string to hash. The name of all
I need to convert a byte[] of size 4 to type long for my
I need to convert values of type T into JsArray . For example, I
need to convert a pdf file to a doc file. I found different type
I need convert 'field' in float type. How can do? char *field = (char
Need to convert a text value `2012-03-19' into a date type, then extract the
I need to convert: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms646839(v=vs.85).aspx lpstrFileTitle Type: LPTSTR The file name and extension (without
I need to convert an input string which can contain \r\n as part of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.