Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7503517
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T21:15:06+00:00 2026-05-29T21:15:06+00:00

I need to define mutually-dependent vars. By this I mean that one var contains

  • 0

I need to define mutually-dependent vars. By this I mean that one var contains e.g. a vector with another var and vice versa. This is illustrated by the following code:

(declare a b)
(def a [1 b])
(def b [a 2])

But after loading this code I get this:

test=> (first a)
1
test=> (second a)
#<Unbound Unbound: #'test/b>
test=> (first b)
[1 #<Unbound Unbound: #'test/b>]
test=> (second b)
2

clearly, thats not how it should work.
I understand that printing such structure will give stack overflow, but I don’t need to print it. How should I do it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T21:15:10+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 9:15 pm

    You can do the following:

    (declare a b)
    (def a [1 #'b])
    (def b [#'a 2])
    
    @(a 1)
    => [#'user/a 2]
    

    Note that #' is a reader macro for referring to a var.

    I’m still not quite sure why you want to do this though….. trying to make vars mutually dependent like this seems like a pretty bad code smell to me. It’s likely that whatever you are trying to do would actually be best solved by a different approach.

    EDIT

    With the extra comment stating that the problem is related to having different types of entities referring to each other, I think a better approach is a map with keywords, e.g.

    (def my-model
      {:a 
          {:name "Entity A" 
           :references [:b]}
       :b 
          {:name "Entity B"
           :references [:a]}}
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to define some constant strings that will be used only by one
on more than one occasion I felt the need to define class methods that
I need to define a schema where I have one attribute that must be
I need to define a calculated member in MDX (this is SAS OLAP, but
I need to define the constant in the module that use the method from
I need to define a Wix file component that may not exist in certain
I need to define an appender for log4net in a way that I get
I need to define many variables and I don't want to do it one
I need to define a string that will include a string that changes (i
I need to define these two Properties to one of my linqclasses (Employee).. because

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.