Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 255523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T21:56:16+00:00 2026-05-11T21:56:16+00:00

I need to deserialize some JavaScript object represented in JSON to an appropriate C#

  • 0

I need to deserialize some JavaScript object represented in JSON to an appropriate C# class. Given the nice features of automatic properties, I would prefer having them in these classes as opposed to just having fields. Unfortunately, the .NET serialization engine (at least, by default) totally ignores automatic properties on deserialization and only cares about the backing field, which is obviously not present in the JavaScript object.

Given that there’s no standard way to name backing fields and to be honest I don’t even want to bother with the “let’s create a JavaScript object that looks like it had C# backing fields” approach as it sounds a bit dirty, the only way I could serialize JavaScript fields to C# auto-properties if I could force the serialization engine to somehow ignore the backing field and use the property directly. Unfortunately, I can’t figure out how this is done or if this can be done at all. Any ideas would be appreciated.

EDIT: Here’s an example:

Javascript:

function Cat()
{
    this.Name = "Whiskers";
    this.Breed = "Tabby";
}
var cat = new Cat();

This is then serialized to “{Name: ‘Whiskers’}”.

The C# class:

[Serializable()]
public class Cat
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Breed { get; set; }
}

And the deserialization code, that fails:

new DataContractJsonSerializer(typeof(Cat)).ReadObject(inputStream);

And it is apparent from the exception that it fails because it is looking for the backing field.

EDIT2: Here’s the exception, if that helps (no inner exceptions):

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationException

“The data contract type ‘Test.Cat’
cannot be deserialized because the
required data members
‘<Name>k__BackingField, <Breed>k__BackingField‘ were not
found.”

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T21:56:16+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:56 pm

    What’s happening here is the deserializer is trying to guess the name of your backing fields.
    You can solve this by adding explicit mappings (DataContract/DataMember attributes) like this:

    [DataContract]
    public class Cat
    {
        [DataMember]
        public string Name { get; set; }
    
        [DataMember]
        public string Breed { get; set; }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 166k
  • Answers 166k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Open the imagefile using Image.FromStream and make sure you close… May 12, 2026 at 1:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Unfortunately, there is no easy built-in way of doing this… May 12, 2026 at 1:25 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Well, your mileage may vary with different browsers and how… May 12, 2026 at 1:25 pm

Related Questions

I have an asp.net webservice with a parameter of type datetime. I have noticed
I've got a little problem that's slightly frustrating. Is it possible to set a
I am using a class library which represents some of its configuration in .xml.
I've successfully made several Visual Studio debugger visualizers, and they're working very well, except

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.