Question

I need to find all matches in a string for a given regex. I’ve been using findall() to do that until I came across a case where it wasn’t doing what I expected. For example:

regex = re.compile('(\d+,?)+')
s = 'There are 9,000,000 bicycles in Beijing.'

print re.search(regex, s).group(0)
> 9,000,000

print re.findall(regex, s)
> ['000']

In this case search() returns what I need (the longest match) but findall() behaves differently, although the docs imply it should be the same:

findall() matches all occurrences of a pattern, not just the first one
as search() does.

• Why is the behaviour different?

• How can I achieve the result of search() with findall() (or something else)?

Answer 1

Ok, I see what’s going on… from the docs:

If one or more groups are present in the pattern, return a list of groups;
this will be a list of tuples if the pattern has more than one group.

As it turns out, you do have a group, “(\d+,?)”… so, what it’s returning is the last occurrence of this group, or 000.

One solution is to surround the entire regex by a group, like this

regex = re.compile('((\d+,?)+)')

then, it will return [(‘9,000,000’, ‘000’)], which is a tuple containing both matched groups. of course, you only care about the first one.

Personally, i would use the following regex

regex = re.compile('((\d+,)*\d+)')

to avoid matching stuff like ” this is a bad number 9,123,”

Edit.

Here’s a way to avoid having to surround the expression by parenthesis or deal with tuples

s = "..."
regex = re.compile('(\d+,?)+')
it = re.finditer(regex, s)

for match in it:
  print match.group(0)

finditer returns an iterator that you can use to access all the matches found. these match objects are the same that re.search returns, so group(0) returns the result you expect.