Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I need to find whether using * or select only the fields you want is faster. In my case, there will be only one match ever.
So, which is faster? This :
SELECT id, name,description,address,phone,img FROM companies WHERE username = '$cname' LIMIT 1
or this one?
SELECT * FROM companies WHERE username = '$cname' LIMIT 1
Do you have any suggestions?
tl;dr It Just Doesn’t Matter.
The only case where it would make any difference is if there was lots of extra data pulled in. The extra overhead needed to be “detectable” over all the other network/disk/processor factors will vary: “Try It And See”, or, run a performance analysis. Also, even if there were additional columns, since it was limited to one record, it is prudent to remember: work = effort * quantity.
I prefer the former explicit syntax myself, except for one-off interactive queries. SQL was meant to be used in a well-shaped manner.
Of course, if the columns in
*matched the covered columns, then there should be absolutely no difference in terms of performance as they will have the same “shape” and query plans.Happy coding.