Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I need to implement JMS as part of RMI implementation.Which is better? using JMS with springs or without it?
Please explain the differences in these two or some references I can go through.
The client implementation is using Springs and the server implements simple RMI and JMS without using springs.
Will this communication work as expected or would there be any issues?
Can a client using JMS with springs receive messages from the server that implements JMS without springs?
The answer is the client does not need to know anything about the server implementation.
You design your client they you want and whatever suites your needs and skills better.
JMS is just a message exchange protocol with many implementations. In my opinion Spring makes it easier to use. If you know grails, it will be even easier.
Good luck!