Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6220611
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T07:59:12+00:00 2026-05-24T07:59:12+00:00

I need to make sure the new supplierpart I’m creating doesn’t exist. It is

  • 0

I need to make sure the new supplierpart I’m creating doesn’t exist. It is currently done like so

try {
    entityManager.get(SupplierPartEntity.class,
    new SupplierPartPK(supplierID, partID));

    throw new CreateSupplierPartActionException("Supplier part record exists for " + supplierID
    + " / " + partID + ".");
} catch (final RecordNotFoundException e) {
    /* supplier part not found - do nothing */
}

its worth noting entityManager will throw a record not found exception when get() would normally return null;

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T07:59:13+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 7:59 am

    If by “less expensive” you mean “doesn’t hit the database”, then no, unless you keep a cache in memory of all existing primary keys. Other than that, the database is the only thing that knows them.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to write a validation to make sure that new records created in
I need to make sure that user can run only one instance of my
We need to make sure only results within the last 30 days are returned
My application depends on another third-party framework and I need to make sure the
I have method in a class that I need to make sure is only
Summary: I'm developing a persistent Java web application, and I need to make sure
I need to add extra validation to my DateField in Admin to make sure
Not sure exactly what I need to do to make this work, so my
In my situation, there is one case in which I need to make sure
Within a VBScript, I need to make sure the user inputs a integer. Here

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.