Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 839843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T05:31:39+00:00 2026-05-15T05:31:39+00:00

I need to parse HTML fragments, by which I mean the files lack <html>,

  • 0

I need to parse HTML fragments, by which I mean the files lack <html>, <head> and <body> elements, otherwise having well-formed XHTML syntax, UTF8 encoding guaranteed. It looks like libxml is ideal for this task, but I have certain constraints which I just don’t know how to implement.

  1. htmlSAXParseFile() does its job well enough, but it seems to create DOM itself, inserting body and html elements in the process. I would like to create DOM myself because I may need to skip some elements and modify others on the fly. Is it possible to somehow tell libxml not to create DOM at all and just parse HTML and call my handlers?
  2. If that’s not possible for libxml HTML parser, I might as well use xmlSAXUserParseFile() which doesn’t seem to create DOM. However, since the files have a structure like <p>…</p><p>…</p>, the parser just spits “Extra content at the end of the document” too early. Is there a way to suppress some parsing errors while still getting notified about them (just because nobody guarantees there will never be other errors in those files)?
  3. There is a whole heck of parsing functions in libxml, some of which accept xmlParserOption as a parameter. Alas, xmlSAXUserParseFile() does not. And those which do all seem to create DOM for some irrelevant API design reasons. Am I missing an obvious candidate?

Oh, and I confess that my reluctance to use libxml’s DOM looks like a quirk. I am extremely constrained with RAM, so I desperately need total control over DOM to be able to drop some nodes on low memory conditions and re-read them if necessary.

Thanks in advance.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T05:31:40+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:31 am

    OK, since nobody has answered the question, I’ll try to do it myself.

    I wrote all the start/end element handlers and it looks like libxml does not create the DOM any more. At least, the returned document pointer is NULL. It still insists on html and body elements, but I can live with that.

    One major problem is that libxml preserves all whitespace nodes, no matter what. So I have to parse text content to eliminate ignorable whitespace. It’s ugly, but it works. Should I mention that parsing UTF-8 is the kind of fun you rarely miss?

    To be honest, libxml documentation is atrocious. My advice to anybody who ever tries reading the docs: read the source code instead. The code is much more readable and documented.

    Thanks for attention.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.