Home/ Questions/Q 179591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-11T14:26:02+00:00

I need to process large image files into smaller image files. I would like

  • 0

I need to process large image files into smaller image files. I would like to distribute the work to many ‘slave’ servers, rather than tasking my main server with this. I am using Windows Server 2005/2008, C#, and ASP.NET. I have a lot of web application development experience but have not developed distributed systems. I had a notion that this could be designed as follows:

1) Files would be placed in a shared network drive

2) Slave servers would periodically poll the drive for new content

3) Slave servers would rename newly found files to something like UNPROCESSED_appIDXXXX_jidXXXXX_photoidXXXXX.tif and begin processing that file.

4) Other slave servers would avoid trying to process files that are in process by examining file name, i.e. if something has been named ‘UNPROCESSED’ they will not attempt to process.

I am wondering a few things:

1) Will there be issues with two slave servers trying to ‘grab’ and rename the file at once, or will Windows Server automatically lock the file?

2) What do you think the best mechanism for notification of new content for processing should be? One simple idea is to write a basic aspx page on each slave system and have it running on a timer. A better idea might be to write a Windows Service that utilizes SystemFileWatcher and have it running on each slave system. A third idea is to have a central server somehow dispatch instructions to a given slave server to attempt a processing job, but I do not know of ways of invoking that kind of communication beyond a very hack-ish approach of having the master server pass a message via HTTP.

I’d much appreciate any guidance you have to offer.

Cheers, -KF

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. If you don’t want to go all the way with a compute cluster type solution. You should consider having a job manager running somewhere that will parcel out the work. That way, when a server becomes available to do work, it asks the job manager for a new bit of work to do. It can then tell the job manager that it’s finished and the job manager can inform your ‘client’ when the work on the whole job is complete. That way, it’s easy to register work and know it’s complete and the job manager can parcel out the work without the worry of race conditions on file renames. 🙂

    • 0