Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I need to run a script (python) in App Engine for many times.
One possibility is just to run a loop and use urlfetch with a link to the script.
The other one is to open a task with the script URL.
What is the difference between both ways? It seems like Tasks have a quota (100,000 daily free tasks) so why should I use them?
Thanks,
Joel
Briefly:
Bulk adding tasks to the queue will probably be easier, and possibly quicker, than using URLFetch. Although using async url-fetches might help with this.
When a task fails, it will automatically retry. Assuming you check the status of your call, URLFetch might just hang for a while before you get some type of error.
You can control the rate at which tasks are executed. So if you add 1,000 tasks fast you can let them slowly run at 10 / minute (or whatever you want), helping you not blow through your other quotas.
If you enable billing, the free quota is 20,000,000 / tasks per day.
Depending on what you are doing, tasks can be transactionally enqueued, which gives you some really powerful abilities.