Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 531265
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:16:59+00:00 2026-05-13T09:16:59+00:00

I need to try a string against multiple (exclusive – meaning a string that

  • 0

I need to try a string against multiple (exclusive – meaning a string that matches one of them can’t match any of the other) regexes, and execute a different piece of code depending on which one it matches. What I have currently is:

m = firstre.match(str)
if m:
    # Do something

m = secondre.match(str)
if m:
    # Do something else

m = thirdre.match(str)
if m:
    # Do something different from both

Apart from the ugliness, this code matches against all regexes even after it has matched one of them (say firstre), which is inefficient. I tried to use:

elif m = secondre.match(str)

but learnt that assignment is not allowed in if statements.

Is there an elegant way to achieve what I want?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:17:00+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:17 am
    def doit( s ):
    
        # with some side-effect on a
        a = [] 
    
        def f1( s, m ):
            a.append( 1 )
            print 'f1', a, s, m
    
        def f2( s, m ):
            a.append( 2 )
            print 'f2', a, s, m
    
        def f3( s, m ):
            a.append( 3 )
            print 'f3', a, s, m
    
        re1 = re.compile( 'one' )
        re2 = re.compile( 'two' )
        re3 = re.compile( 'three' )
    
    
        func_re_list = (
            ( f1, re1 ), 
            ( f2, re2 ), 
            ( f3, re3 ),
        )
        for myfunc, myre in func_re_list:
            m = myre.match( s )
            if m:
                myfunc( s, m )
                break
    
    
    doit( 'one' ) 
    doit( 'two' ) 
    doit( 'three' ) 
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 316k
  • Answers 316k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use the overload that takes the existing destination: Mapper.Map<Source, Destination>(source,… May 13, 2026 at 11:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes, that is the way it works - and that's… May 13, 2026 at 11:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Thanks for the reply. I tried your code, but was… May 13, 2026 at 11:26 pm

Related Questions

We have a Crystal Report that lets the user pick which of several fields
I read somewhere that one should never use error conditions as normal program flow.
We're gettin' hairy here. I've tested a bunch of tree-synchronizing code on concrete representations
I need to validate a XML file against a schema. The XML file is
Here at work, we often need to find a string from the list of

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.