Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8910571
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T03:43:20+00:00 2026-06-15T03:43:20+00:00

I notice that most OSes that define IPv6 multicast define two sets of socket

  • 0

I notice that most OSes that define IPv6 multicast define two sets of socket options; IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP/IPV6_DROP_MEMBERSHIP and IPV6_JOIN_GROUP/IPV6_LEAVE_GROUP. Whenever I find them, they are documented as synonyms, taking the same option value. In fact some go as far as to #define one to literally mean the other; for example

#define IPV6_JOIN_GROUP IPV6_ADD_MEMBERSHIP

Is there any difference here, or is it just historical baggage – two names for the same thing?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T03:43:22+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 3:43 am

    They’re identical. Synonyms, just like you said.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I notice that most people use the words HTML tags and HTML elements interchangeably.
In most of the examples I see, I notice that in the controller, the
I notice that most android apps have some sort of standard in that they
I noticed that most scripts for e-mail validation do not use DNS information to
I have noticed that most Objective-C coders never use the self->ivar syntax when accessing
I've noticed that most 3d gaming/rendering environments represent solids as a mesh of (usually
I am studying how the android.speech package works and I noticed that most of
I'm currently building my own login script and have noticed that most append the
Looking through a few SQL implementations, I noticed that most DBMSs support defining an
I've noticed that on most, if not all, standard web controls in the System.Web.UI.WebControls

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.