Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 985323
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T05:08:48+00:00 2026-05-16T05:08:48+00:00

I notice this weird behavior where I change the column type from ntext to

  • 0

I notice this weird behavior where I change the column type from ntext to nvarchar(max) and in the INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS the data_type remains ntext …

Is there something i must execute for the metadata to be refreshed?

I’m on sql server 2005

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T05:08:48+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 5:08 am

    I don’t get this behaviour on tables on SQL2005 (I just tested)

    Is this for a view based on a table definition that has changed? If so

    exec sp_refreshsqlmodule 'schema.ViewName'
    

    should do it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have CheckedListbox bound to List. However I notice, the weird behavior of this
I notice this behavior in python for the pool allocation. Even though I have
I have noticed this weird behavior in firefox, it seems like font have some
I notice this thread: Fastish Python/Jython IPC , and I have a similar problem,
I notice that this method is provided in UIViewController .m files, but is commented
I am doing some exercises in my object-oriented javascript book, I notice that this:
I have this error NOTICE: UNDEFINED VARIABLE: LOGO IN C:\WAMP\WWW\SITE\TOOLS\SMARTY\SYSPLUGINS\SMARTY_INTERNAL_DATA.PHP ON LINE 291 CALL
So in the code below you'll notice the comment // This item is obfuscated
Notice in the bottom right hand corner of this page it has the SVN
Kindly go through this link and notice the solution given by "thepeer": https://stackoverflow.com/a/3494108 I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.