Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6908375
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T08:33:20+00:00 2026-05-27T08:33:20+00:00

I noticed an interesting problem. If I run the following code in R 2.12.0

  • 0

I noticed an interesting problem. If I run the following code in R 2.12.0 (32-Bit) on a windows 3.00 gHz Core 2 Duo CPU with 2GB of RAM, it runs in less than one second. If I run it on a unix-box with sparc-sun-solaris2.10 (Also 32-Bit, though the unix box could run 64-bit) it takes 84 seconds. The processing speed of the unix box is 2.5 gHz. If I run top while the code is running, I noticed that my R process is only taking up to ~3.2% of available cpu states, even if more are available. Could this be part of the problem? I read the install manual, but nothing jumped out at me as the obvious solution to my problem. Is the unix operating system somehow limiting available resources while windows is not? Or, is there some preferable way to compile R from source that was not done? I apologize if I have not given enough information to answer the problem, this is not really my area of expertise.

t0 <- proc.time()[[3]]
x <- rnorm(10000)
for(i in 1:10000){
    sd(x)
}
print(proc.time()[[3]]-t0)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T08:33:20+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:33 am

    Processors such as the T1 or T2 have a number of cores, and each core has a number of strands (hardware-level context switching). If you can run a multithreaded application, you’ll get a large throughput. A typical intended use case would be a Java based web server, processing e.g. 20-40 connections at the same time.

    The downside of this type of processors is that single threaded performance of these SPARC chips is quite low. It looks like Oracle is aware of the issue; the current development on T4 focuses on improving the single threaded speed.

    The T1 processor exposes 32 logical CPUs to the operating system. If this was your case, and the displayed value was the percent of total computing power, 1/32 ~= 3.125%, which is close to what you saw.

    To squeeze all the performance from a T1 processor, you need to make R use multiple CPUs, for example via the multicore package.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've noticed this interesting problem: function a() { this.aprop = 1; } function b()
I came up with an interesting way to solve the following problem and I
I noticed an interesting bug with the JQTouch platform and wanted to know if
I am relatively new to C#, and I noticed something interesting today that I
While inspecting delegates in C# and .NET in general, I noticed some interesting facts:
Noticed this today when a patch was submitted with the following line: lblCompletionTime.Text =
I've noticed that if I build my WPF application for Any CPU/x64, it takes
I encountered an interesting thing today that I have never noticed before. It appears
Here's an interesting problem. Is it possible to split a string on the last
I ran across an interesting issue in some of my humanize_bytes() code. This loop

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.