Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3316862
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:31:09+00:00 2026-05-17T22:31:09+00:00

I noticed in my C++ code that anytime I close an std::ofstream object I’m

  • 0

I noticed in my C++ code that anytime I close an std::ofstream object I’m unable to reopen the file I closed with std::ifstream. std::ifstream‘s open function will always fail.

Is there anything ‘extra’ I can do to ensure that my std::ofstream object closes properly?

Someone’s probably going to ask to see my specific code so for the sake of keeping this post small I’ve pastied it here. In my code after running through case a or d all std::ifstream open calls fail. (Prior to posting this question I had several people play with my code who were unable to conclude anything other than that std::ofstream close failing for unknown reasons)

Thanks in advance to any and all responses received.

Code is

#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

typedef struct Entry
{
   string Name;
   string Address;
   string Phone;   
};

int main()
{
   bool exit = false, found = false;
   char input, ch;
   string stringinput, stringoutput;
   ifstream fin, ibuffer;
   ofstream fout, obuffer;
   Entry buffer;

   while(!exit)
   {
      cout << "Welcome to the Address Book Application!" << endl << endl;
      cout << "\tSelect an option:" << endl << endl;
      cout << "\tA -- Add New Entry" << endl;
      cout << "\tD -- Delete an Entry" << endl;
      cout << "\tS -- Search for an Existing Entry" << endl;
      cout << "\tE -- Exit" << endl << endl;

      cin >> input;

      switch(input)
      {
         case 'a':
         case 'A':
         cin.ignore(255,'\n');//Apparently necessary because an extra new line carrys over in the cin stream
         system("cls");
         //Get Information from User
         cout << "Enter Phone Number: ";
         getline(cin, buffer.Phone);
         cout << endl << "Enter Name: ";
         getline(cin, buffer.Name);
         cout << endl << "Enter Address: ";
         getline(cin, buffer.Address);
         /*Copy existing database into a buffer. In other words, back it up*/
         fin.open("address.txt");
         if(!fin)
         {
            fin.close();
            fout.open("address.txt");
            fout << buffer.Phone << endl << buffer.Name << endl << buffer.Address << endl;
         }
         if(fin)
         {
            obuffer.open("buffer.txt");
            while(fin && fin.get(ch))
               obuffer.put(ch);
            fin.close();
            obuffer.close();
            /*Copy buffer to new database file*/
            ibuffer.open("buffer.txt");
            fout.open("address.txt");//This removes all of the previously existing info from database.txt
            while(ibuffer && ibuffer.get(ch))
               fout.put(ch);
            ibuffer.close();
            remove("buffer.txt");//Delete the buffer
            fout << endl << buffer.Phone << endl << buffer.Name << endl << buffer.Address << endl;
         }

         buffer.Phone.erase();
         buffer.Name.erase();
         buffer.Address.erase();
         fout.close();
         break;

         case 'd':
         case 'D':
         cin.ignore(255,'\n');//Apparently necessary because an extra new line carrys over in the cin stream
         system("cls");
         cout << "Enter the phone number of the entry to delete: ";
         cin >> stringinput;
         fin.open("address.txt");
         if(!fin)
         {
            cout << endl << "No entries exist!";
            fin.close();
            break;
         }
         obuffer.open("buffer.txt");
         /* Copy everything over into the buffer besides the account we wish to delete */
         while(!fin.eof())
         {

            fin.read(&ch, sizeof(char));

            if(ch != '\n' && ch != '\0')
            stringoutput += ch;

            if(ch == '\n' || ch == '\0')
            {
               if(stringinput.compare(stringoutput))
               {
                  stringoutput += ch;
                  obuffer << stringoutput;
                  stringoutput.erase();
               }

               if(!stringinput.compare(stringoutput))
               {
                  stringoutput += ch;
                  getline(fin, stringoutput);
                  getline(fin, stringoutput);
                  fin.read(&ch, sizeof(char));//Get rid of the extra '\n'
                  stringoutput.erase();
               }

            }

         }

         //Hack: Copy the last line over since the loop for some reason doesn't
         obuffer << stringoutput;
         stringoutput.erase();

         fin.close();
         obuffer.close();

         fout.open("address.txt");
         ibuffer.open("buffer.txt");

         while(ibuffer && ibuffer.get(ch))
            fout.put(ch);

         ibuffer.close();
         fout.close();
         remove("buffer.txt");

         cout << endl << "Entry " << stringinput << " deleted successfully!" << endl;
         stringinput.erase();
         stringoutput.erase();
         break;

         case 's':
         case 'S':
         cin.ignore(255,'\n');//Apparently necessary because an extra new line carrys over in the cin stream
         system("cls");

         found = false;

         fin.open("address.txt");
         if(!fin)
         {
            cout << "No entries currently exist!" << endl << endl;
            fin.close();
            break;
         }

         cout << "Enter the phone number to search for: ";
         cin >> stringinput;

         while(!fin.eof())
         {
            fin.read(&ch, sizeof(char));

            if(ch != '\n' && ch != '\0')
               stringoutput += ch;

            if(ch == '\n' || ch == '\0')
            {
               if(!stringinput.compare(stringoutput))
               {
                  found = true;
                  break;
               }

               stringoutput.erase();
            }

         }

         if(found)
         {
            cout << "Phone Number: " << stringinput << endl;
            getline(fin, stringoutput);
            cout << "Name: " << stringoutput << endl;
            getline(fin, stringoutput);
            cout << "Address: " << stringoutput << endl << endl;
         }

         if(!found)
         {
            stringoutput.erase();
            cout << endl << stringinput << " is not in the address book!" << endl << endl;
         }

         stringinput.erase();
         stringoutput.erase();
         fin.close();
         break;

         case 'e':
         case 'E':
         exit = true;
         break;

         default:
         system("cls");
         cout << input << " is not a valid option." << endl << endl;
         break;
      }

   }

   return 0;

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:31:10+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:31 pm

    The best way to ensure your streams are reset at each point in this processing is not to explicitly close them, but to declare them at the point of use and allow them to go out of scope. This is the RAII point that was made in comments. In your case this means moving the declaraion from the top of the function to inside each arm of the switch where they are used. This way you can be sure that each file is cleanly closed when you exit from a particular case, as the ofstream and ifstream close the file during destruction on scope exit.

    Another thing I noticed is that you are testing a strange thing after file open:

     fin.open("address.txt");
     if(!fin)
    

    This tests for a bad stream but I don’t think it’s complete – if you are testing for a successful open, you should also test

     fin.open("address.txt");
     if (!fin.is_open())
    

    All of your file processing loops and open() calls need to check for fin.fail() or fout.fail() as well as fin.eof(), to rule out file access error as an unhandled condition that is confusing your observed behaviour.

    At this point, I suggest you fix these obvious misunderstandings, and come back with more specific questions if you cannot get it working.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So, im trying to write some code that utilizes Nvidia's CUDA architecture. I noticed
I noticed some code of a colleague today that initialized class variables in the
In Silverlight I noticed that the code-behind Page class inherits from UserControl: public partial
I've been using Javascript's Date for a project, but noticed today that my code
I noticed using task manager that the following code has a GDI leak in
We've noticed that IE7 has an odd behavor with code blocks posted on Stack
I have noticed that my geocoder is inconsistent in the code shown below because
I noticed by looking at sample code from Apple, that they tend to design
I was looking at the Java code for LinkedList and noticed that it made
I noticed that a lot of tutorial instructions often have this code: $sql=SELECT *

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.