Home/ Questions/Q 6109053
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-23T14:21:44+00:00

I noticed in the HTTP spec (section 5.1.2) that a HTTP request to a

  • 0

I noticed in the HTTP spec (section 5.1.2) that a HTTP request to a HTTP proxy uses an absolute URI:

GET http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1968887/uribuilder-and-in-uri HTTP/1.1

while a non-proxied request uses a relative URI:

GET /relative_path.html HTTP/1.1

In either case, a “Host:” header is also specified. Since the “Host:” header already specifies the target of the request, why is the absolute URI required for the HTTP proxy? The spec says something about avoiding request loops, but I’m not at all certain that has anything to do with my question.

I’ve checked in a network monitor and verified that at least on my system, requests do behave as described above.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I suspect because the “Host” header only appeared in HTTP 1.1 (I think). Prior to that, the path was all there was. This wasn’t enough for the proxy, so the host had to be added to the body for it to work.

    It’s sort-of redundant with HTTP 1.1, I suppose, but it’s there for backward compatibility now.

    • 0