Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6321771
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T16:12:40+00:00 2026-05-24T16:12:40+00:00

I noticed that the Google C2DM (push) tcp connection uses port 5228. I also

  • 0

I noticed that the Google C2DM (push) tcp connection uses port 5228. I also know that some firewalls block ports other than 80 443 (because of htttp and https), which causes lots of users to complain that they can’t use the Market app or GTalk on their phones using their company wifi for example.

Now my question is: why didn’t Google choose port 443 or 80 for their persistent tcp connection?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T16:12:40+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:12 pm

    There are a few reasons I can think of that Google may have chosen to use 5228 instead of 80 or 443.

    Firstly, in most (but definitely not all) cases, 5228 should not be a problem (i.e. blocked) because push notifications are largely used when devices are on the go. This means they are using cell phone data connections that do not block this port and are not firewalled.

    Secondly, in the case of environments where there might be a firewall (i.e. with WiFi inside a corporation), it is also likely that http traffic is proxied or controlled in some fashion. C2DM does not rely on a standard HTTP protocol and is expected to be a long-lived connection. This means that running it on 80/443 might cause issues in these environments.

    Thirdly, these services likely were using 5228 prior to the release of C2DM and there was no clear reason to change it.

    Based on my experience, I think it would have been ideal if they used 5228 as a default, and attempted to fall-back to 443 in other cases (as there are definitely many scenarios where 443 would work when 5228 wouldn’t). At least in the case of 443, modification of data is less-likely than if on port 80 because the protocol would normally be encrypted. However, it is still possible the connection would be prematurely terminated on 443. However, this risk exists in any network environment, and there would be no downfall in trying.

    And on separate note, it is likely that enabling C2DM on 443 would have been more difficult than it seems for Google because their distributed front-end servers likely know how to specifically handle 80/443 traffic as HTTP and would require significant re-working to handle C2DM.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am a Google Maps API (JavaScript) developer. I have noticed that Google uses
I noticed that many websites, even Google and some banking sites, have poorly-written HTML
I noticed that for some apps in Google Play, their CURRENT VERSION says Varies
I have noticed that some json queries, particularly in google services, return a peculiar
I just noticed that now when using Google Translate, the site is updating also
Today I noticed that a few Google advertisements in an adsence block on one
I am using Google Chrome 3.0.196.2 and I noticed that for some reason the
I have noticed that Google Toolbox for Mac replaces several SQLite built-in functions (LOWER/UPPER,
I have noticed that when you view PDFs in google docs the PDF viewer
I'm using google chrome and I noticed that every time I do an XHR

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.