Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4579576
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T20:39:41+00:00 2026-05-21T20:39:41+00:00

I noticed today that haml & sass have split in their upgrade to 3.1.

  • 0

I noticed today that haml & sass have split in their upgrade to 3.1.

I used to get them both in my Rails project with gem 'haml-rails' (though, perhaps I manually added SASS to my gem directory?!? Anyway…)

I’m trying to understand dependencies & whatnot and wondering what I need to do now to get both haml & sass updated to 3.1 in my project(s)…

I see haml docs now say to use gem 'haml' to get haml…does this mean haml-rails is unnecessary/redundant now?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T20:39:42+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 8:39 pm

    Based on my test, you still need haml-rails if you want .haml views automatically generated when you run rails g controller or rails g scaffold

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today I have noticed that the order in which the $lt and $gt operators
I noticed today that if you declare a nullable DateTime object you don't get
I encountered an interesting thing today that I have never noticed before. It appears
I have a wcf webHttp endpoint and noticed today that when called httpGet with
Today my question is about UITableViewController-s In particular I have noticed that the datasource
Today I noticed that the code I have been using to display a FBDialog
I noticed whilst playing around today that both the objects below when sent init
I have a program that gathers information from referring urls. Today i noticed that
I noticed today that I can't use * to pass width or precision arguments
I am relatively new to C#, and I noticed something interesting today that I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.