Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8997939
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T23:57:26+00:00 2026-06-15T23:57:26+00:00

I often find myself doing this: for x in range(x_size): for y in range(y_size):

  • 0

I often find myself doing this:

for x in range(x_size):
    for y in range(y_size):
        for z in range(z_size):
            pass # do something here

Is there a more concise way to do this in Python? I am thinking of something along the lines of

for x, z, y in ... ? :
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T23:57:26+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 11:57 pm

    You can use itertools.product:

    >>> for x,y,z in itertools.product(range(2), range(2), range(3)):
    ...     print x,y,z
    ... 
    0 0 0
    0 0 1
    0 0 2
    0 1 0
    0 1 1
    0 1 2
    1 0 0
    1 0 1
    1 0 2
    1 1 0
    1 1 1
    1 1 2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I often find myself doing something like this a lot: something | grep cat
I often find myself doing things like this when manipulating tables:- $($('table tr').children()[2]).html(); For
Ok, I find myself doing this often. I'll attach ids to my tables and
So I find myself doing something like the following pattern often. Instead of: if
I often find myself wanting to do something like this, I have something wrapped
I often find myself repeatedly yanking something after doing some kills and it becomes
I often find find myself doing a workflow like this: $ find . |grep
Doing component-based development, I find myself doing this fairly often: public class SomeClass {
I often find myself doing quick checks like this: if (!eregi('.php', $fileName)) { $filename
I find myself doing the following often enough that I feel like there must

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.