Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6086645
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T11:46:46+00:00 2026-05-23T11:46:46+00:00

I often find the need to use the following pattern: template<typename T> class SomeClass

  • 0

I often find the need to use the following pattern:

template<typename T>
class SomeClass : public Base {
   SomeClass(const T& t) {...}
   ...
};
template<typename T>
SomeClass<T>* makeSomeClass(const T& t) {
   return new SomeClass<T>(t);
}

And to use it:

Base* = makeSomeClass(123);

This is useful when I don’t want to explicitly specify T because it is a very complex (function types, etc’) and the function argument can deduce the type implicitly.
Is there a way to do this without the extra “make” function? Why does template deduction work only in function arguments and not in constructor arguments?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T11:46:46+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 11:46 am

    No, there is no way to do this without an extra make function.

    The reason it doesn’t work with constructors is because it would be ridiculously complicated. Consider this:

    template <typename T>
    struct Foo
    {
        Foo(const T& val) { ... }
        Foo(const Foo<T>& other) { ... } // Copy constructor
    };
    
    Foo<int> x;
    

    What if I then call:

    Foo(x);
    

    Does that give me a Foo< Foo<int> > or am I calling the copy constructor for a Foo<int>?

    It would be ambiguous in too many places, so the extra function is necessary.

    Note that you can automate the create of make functions a little by using template templates:

    template <template <typename> class TemplateClass, typename Type>
    TemplateClass<Type> make(const Type& x)
    {
        return TemplateClass<Type>(x);
    }
    

    Then you can use:

    make<SomeClass>(123); // returns a SomeClass<int>
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When programming for the iPhone, I find that I often need to use the
I find myself writing this class often in my python code when I need
I find this selector format cumbersome if I need to use it often: $('[name=someElementName]').val()
Here at work, we often need to find a string from the list of
I find myself often with a situation where I need to perform an operation
When laying out a class hierarchy, I often find myself frustrated at the gap
I often find the need to include away and present type visual states that
I often find myself wanting to use a 3rd party python module in my
I often find myself writing var message = Hello {0}; and then going back
I often find myself using Integers to represent values in different spaces. For example...

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.