Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6569777
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T14:40:27+00:00 2026-05-25T14:40:27+00:00

I often have code like this: function Object() { } Object.prototype.getData() { // THIS

  • 0

I often have code like this:

function Object() {
}

Object.prototype.getData() {
    // THIS LINE:
    var object = this;
    $.ajax({
        url: '...'
        , success: function(data) {
            object.onLoadData(data);
        }
    })
}

var o = new Object();
o.getData();

My question: what’s the preferred paradigm for the “var object = this” bit above? I’ve seen this:

var self = this;

Which looks good, and I’ll probably steal this method. What is the most common way of referring to parent object from within anonymous functions? Are there cleverer ways of doing this? I often find myself putting the “var object = this;” at the top of most object methods, and it seems like there might be some tricky way to avoid this.

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T14:40:29+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:40 pm

    Given your code, don’t use a variable.

    Use the context: parameter to set the this value in the callbacks.

    Object.prototype.getData = function() {
        $.ajax({
            url: '...',
            context: this, // <-----------set the context for the callbacks
            success: function(data) {
                this.onLoadData(data);
            }
        });
    };
    

    If the question wasn’t meant to only deal with $.ajax, then I’d use bind()[docs] to bind the this value to the function.

    function successCallback(data) {
        this.onLoadData(data);
    }
    
    Object.prototype.getData = function() {
        $.ajax({
            url: '...',
            success: successCallback.bind( this );
        });
    };
    

    If you need to support browsers that don’t have .bind(), then there’s a shim in the docs link I provided that you can include.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

in my webapp I have a variable like this var data = { getItem:
I often see JavaScript code where a function may take in an options object
I often have the following situation in my PowerShell code: I have a function
Often in my code I start threads which basically look like this: void WatchForSomething()
I have some e-commerce code that I use often that uses Linq To SQL
I often have data in Excel or text that I need to get into
I often have customer requesting changing properties, like the version history setting on all
I have the following code which lets me execute a workflow. This could be
i often use but i have this problem. if there is a whose action
I often see source code using types like uint32, uint64 and I wonder if

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.