Home/ Questions/Q 640027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-13T20:54:28+00:00

I often hear complaints that programming languages that make heavy use of symbols for

  • 0

I often hear complaints that programming languages that make heavy use of symbols for brevity, most notably C and C++ (I’m not going to touch APL), are difficult to type because they require frequent use of the shift key. A year or two ago, I got tired of it myself, downloaded Microsoft’s Keyboard Layout Creator, made a few changes to my layout, and have not once looked back. The speed difference is astounding; with these few simple changes I am able to type C++ code around 30% faster, depending of course on how hairy it is; best of all, my typing speed in ordinary running text is not compromised.

My questions are these: what alternate keyboard layouts have existed for programming, which have gained popularity, are any of them still in modern use, do you personally use any altered layout, and how can my layout be further optimised?

I made the following changes to a standard QWERTY layout. (I don’t use Dvorak, but there is a programmer Dvorak layout worth mentioning.)

  • Swap numbers with symbols in the top row, because long or repeated literal numbers are typically replaced with named constants;
  • Swap backquote with tilde, because backquotes are rare in many languages but destructors are common in C++;
  • Swap minus with underscore, because underscores are common in identifiers;
  • Swap curly braces with square brackets, because blocks are more common than subscripts; and
  • Swap double quote with single quote, because strings are more common than character literals.

I suspect this last is probably going to be the most controversial, as it interferes the most with running text by requiring use of shift to type common contractions. This layout has significantly increased my typing speed in C++, C, Java, and Perl, and somewhat increased it in LISP and Python.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    I still hold that typing speed is not the main factor in the time it takes for a project to be completed. If it is, there is a big problem (Weeks of coding saves us hours of planning).

    Regarding your question I prefer using the standard layout as it means I don’t have to spend the first 10 minutes looking stupid when presented with a standard keyboard layout.

    Some of the replacements you have suggested, e.g. the top row with the special characters doesn’t make a ounce of difference as the outside finger on the other hand should be moving to shift at the same time.

    IMHO One thing that helps above chaining layouts is using only keyboard shortcuts. Vim and Emacs are recommended. It makes moving text around far faster.

    • 0