Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 42557
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T15:21:24+00:00 2026-05-10T15:21:24+00:00

I often plug pre-configured lambdas into enumerable methods like ‘map’, ‘select’ etc. but the

  • 0

I often plug pre-configured lambdas into enumerable methods like ‘map’, ‘select’ etc. but the behavior of ‘inject’ seems to be different. e.g. with

mult4 = lambda {|item| item * 4 } 

then

(5..10).map &mult4 

gives me

[20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40] 

However, if I make a 2-parameter lambda for use with an inject like so,

multL = lambda {|product, n| product * n } 

I want to be able to say

(5..10).inject(2) &multL 

since ‘inject’ has an optional single parameter for the initial value, but that gives me …

irb(main):027:0> (5..10).inject(2) &multL LocalJumpError: no block given         from (irb):27:in `inject'         from (irb):27 

However, if I stuff the ‘&multL’ into a second parameter to inject, then it works.

irb(main):028:0> (5..10).inject(2, &multL) => 302400 

My question is ‘why does that work and not the previous attempt?’

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T15:21:25+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 3:21 pm

    So the reason that

    (5..10).map &mult4 

    works and

    (5..10).inject(2) &multL 

    doesn’t is that ruby parens are implicit in the first case, so it really means

    (5..10).map(&mult4) 

    if you wanted, for the second case you could use

    (5..10).inject 2, &multL 

    The outside the parens trick only works for passing blocks to a method, not lambda objects.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 61k
  • Answers 61k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer The memory limiter in PHP is optional; if you disable… May 11, 2026 at 9:43 am
  • added an answer They're a great way of encapsulating a piece of code.… May 11, 2026 at 9:43 am
  • added an answer Another solution (not that pythonic, but very fast) is to… May 11, 2026 at 9:43 am

Related Questions

I often plug pre-configured lambdas into enumerable methods like 'map', 'select' etc. but the
I often encounter the following scenario where I need to offer many different types
I often use webservice this way public void CallWebservice() { mywebservice web = new
I often have to sort a dictionary (consisting of keys & values) by value.
I often run into the following problem. I work on some changes to a
I often refactor code first by creating an inner class inside the class I'm
I often use the top command to see what is taking up resources. Mostly
I often have data in Excel or text that I need to get into
I often see code like: Iterator i = list.iterator(); while(i.hasNext()) { ... } but
I often use the execv() function in C++, but if some of the arguments

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.