Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8085859
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T18:15:53+00:00 2026-06-05T18:15:53+00:00

I often see code a function defined without visibility keywords. e.g: class Foo() {

  • 0

I often see code a function defined without visibility keywords. e.g:

class Foo() {
  function bar() {
    // ...
  }
}

Is it a shorthand of public function? Is it a good practice to omit it?

class Foo() {
  public function bar() {
    //..
  }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T18:15:55+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 6:15 pm

    As written in the PHP Doc,

    Methods declared without any explicit visibility keyword are defined as public.

    So, yes, in

    class Foo() { public function bar() { //.. } }
    

    Foo::bar() is public, but omitting the visibility keyword is never a good practice. If it’s a fast and ugly script why not, but in other cases you should specify it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I often see this idiom when reading php code: public function __construct($config) { if
Often I see a global object defined in javascript code to act as a
Quite often see in JavaScript libraries code like this: setTimeout(function() { ... }, 0);
I often see the following code: (function () { // init part })(); but
I often see JavaScript code where a function may take in an options object
I often see code like int hashCode(){ return a^b; } Why XOR?
Question 1: I am studying Android service and often see code like this: private
Often I see javascript code where event handlers (like onmousemove) are assigned dynamically. Example:
I often see in C# code the following convention: some_type val; val = something;
I often see a pattern used in circumstances where we have look-up code that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.