Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 823593
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:58:18+00:00 2026-05-15T02:58:18+00:00

I often see code like that which is shown here , ie where an

  • 0

I often see code like that which is shown here, ie where an object is allocated and then used as a “lock object”.

It seems to me that you could use any object for this, including the event itself as the lock object. Why allocate a new object that does nothing? My understanding is that calling lock() on an object doesn’t actually alter the object itself, nor does it actually lock it from being used, it’s simply used as a placeholder for multiple lock statements to anchor on.

public class Shape : IDrawingObject, IShape
{
    // Create an event for each interface event
    event EventHandler PreDrawEvent;
    event EventHandler PostDrawEvent;

    object objectLock = new Object();

    // Explicit interface implementation required.
    // Associate IDrawingObject's event with
    // PreDrawEvent
    event EventHandler IDrawingObject.OnDraw
    {
        add
        {
            lock (objectLock)
            {
                PreDrawEvent += value;
            }
        }
        remove
        {
            lock (objectLock)
            {
                PreDrawEvent -= value;
            }
        }
    }
}

So my question is, is this really a good thing to do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:58:19+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:58 am

    including the event itself

    No, you can’t do that. An “event” is actually just some accessor methods. Assuming you mean the backing delegate, that would be very bad – delegates are immutable: every time you add/remove a subscriber, you get a different delegate.

    Actually, the 4.0 compiler now does this with lock-free code using Interlocked – it may be worth following this approach instead.

    In your example, the objectLock ensures that all callers (to that instance) are locking against the same object, which is important – but without the ugliness of locking on this (which is how the C# compiler used to work).

    —

    Update: your example shows code that is necessary before C# 4.0, access to a field-like-event inside the type talked directly to the field: the normal field-like-event locking was not respected. This was changed in C# 4.0; you can now (in C# 4.0) safely re-write this as:

    public class Shape : IDrawingObject, IShape
    {
        // Create an event for each interface event
        event EventHandler PreDrawEvent;
        event EventHandler PostDrawEvent;
    
        event EventHandler IDrawingObject.OnDraw
        {
            add { PreDrawEvent += value; }
            remove { PreDrawEvent -= value; }
        }
    }
    

    All the correct behaviour is then followed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 416k
  • Answers 417k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Who knows. The Standard doesn't say how many digits of… May 15, 2026 at 9:31 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The calling scalar-valued function is absolutely correct solution. May 15, 2026 at 9:31 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is the standard floating-point question. Use a decimal instead.… May 15, 2026 at 9:31 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.