Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6383033
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T02:35:56+00:00 2026-05-25T02:35:56+00:00

I often write code like that: MyObject property; MyObject Property { get { return

  • 0

I often write code like that:

MyObject property;
MyObject Property
{
    get { return property; }
    set {
            if (property != null)
                property.Changed -= property_Changed; // unsubscribe from the old value
            property = value;
            property.Changed += property_Changed; // subscribe to the new value
        }
}

I’m looking for an elegant way to make the unsubscribing automatic.
Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T02:35:57+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 2:35 am

    Perhaps using Extensions Methods might be what you are looking for.

    You could try something like this.

    private MyProperty property;
    public MyProperty Property
    {
        get { return property; }
        set { property.SubPubValue(value, property_Changed); }
    }
    
    private static void property_Changed(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
    
    public static class Extensions
    {
        public static void SubPubValue<T>(this T value, T setValue, PropertyChangedEventHandler property_Changed) where T : MyProperty
        {
            if (setValue != null)
                value.PropertyChanged -= property_Changed;
            value = setValue;
            if (setValue != null)
                value.PropertyChanged += property_Changed;
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I often find I want to write code something like this in C#, but
Often, programmers write code that generates other code. (The technical term is metaprogramming ,
When I use an imperative language I often write code like foo (x) {
I am very often write menu like that: User clicks on menu item and
When I code, I always write little pieces of unit, and compile it often.
It's often the case that I can write a nice tight little VB.NET function,
In OpenGL, one often writes code like this: glPushMatrix(); // modify the current matrix
Like lots of you guys on SO, I often write in several languages. And
I often see code like: Iterator i = list.iterator(); while(i.hasNext()) { ... } but
I like that vim 7.0 supports spell checking via :set spell, and I like

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.