Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6894077
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:44:15+00:00 2026-05-27T06:44:15+00:00

I often write stuff that looks like this: def AModel < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user

  • 0

I often write stuff that looks like this:

def AModel < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :user

  def SomeCodeThatDoesSomeCalculations
    # some code here
  end

  def SomeCodeThatDoesSomeCalculations!
    self.SomeCodeThatDoesSomeCalculations
    self.save
  end
end

Is there a better way to generate the functions with the suffix “!” ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:44:16+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:44 am

    If you’re doing it really often you can do smth like that:

    class Model < ActiveRecord::Base
    
      def self.define_with_save(method_name)
        define_method "#{method_name}!" do
          send method_name
          save
        end
      end
    
      def save # stub method for test purpose
        puts 'saving...'
      end
    
      def do_stuff
        puts 'doing stuff...'
      end
      define_with_save :do_stuff
    
    end
    
    m = Model.new
    
    m.do_stuff
    # => 'doing stuff...'
    
    m.do_stuff!
    # => 'doing stuff...'
    # => 'saving...'
    

    If you want that in multiple models may be you’d like to create your own base class for them containing this define_with_save class method, or you can add it to ActiveRecord::Base itself if you are sure you need it.

    Btw, I hope you’re not really naming you your methods in SomeCodeThatDoesSomeCalculations notation as they are usually named like some_code_that_does_some_calculations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am very often write menu like that: User clicks on menu item and
I often find I want to write code something like this in C#, but
I often find this strange CDATA tag in XML files: <![CDATA[some stuff]]> I have
While it is easy to write something that does this by myself, I often
I often write code like that: MyObject property; MyObject Property { get { return
I often write something like: def myAction{ MyActionCommand cmd -> if( cmd.hasErrors() ){ return
Without automatic reference counting you often write code like this, when adding a new
I often write classes with a DLL export/import specification, but this seems to confuse
In my classes I often write a quick operator!= by returning !(*this == rhs)
Often, programmers write code that generates other code. (The technical term is metaprogramming ,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.