Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 184957
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:23:04+00:00 2026-05-11T15:23:04+00:00

I overloaded the [] operator in my class. Is there a nicer way to

  • 0

I overloaded the [] operator in my class. Is there a nicer way to call this function from within my class other than (*this)[i]?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:23:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:23 pm

    Add function at(size_t i) and use this function.

    EDIT: If you actively using stl avoid semantic inconsistence: in std::vector operator[] does not check if index is valid, but at(..) check and could throw std::out_of_range exception. I think in project with more stl similar behavior will expected from your class.

    Maybe this name is not best one for this function.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have overloaded the + operator like this class sample { private : int
I have an overloaded << operator from my reckful class implemented as follows: ostream&
Assuming following code. There is class MyStream witch has template overloaded operator <<. There
Why doesn't the STL string class have an overloaded char* operator built-in? Is there
I know the = operator can't be overloaded, but there must be a way
There is a class A having the virtual method print() and overloaded operator <<
I've got a simple class Currency with overloaded operator<<. I don't know how can
I have my class, where I overloaded the ! operator: class obj { public:
I have a class which does not have copy constructor or operator= overloaded. The
I'm trying to overload the '--' postfix operator. I have this code: class Counter

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.