Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5929889
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T14:29:01+00:00 2026-05-22T14:29:01+00:00

I presume this atomic operation is faster than ++ . I only see advantages

  • 0

I presume this atomic operation is faster than ++. I only see advantages favoring Interlocked.Increment. What are its disavantages?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T14:29:02+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 2:29 pm

    Atomic means it is thread-safe (i.e. it is impossible for one thread to read the value while another is changing it.) Which makes it slower, not faster, due to the need to use thread synchronization mechanisms. You want to use ++ if you don’t care about thread-safety. Here is some discussion on the relative performance of the ++ operator in different contexts.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I can't see this in the docs, but I presume it's a solved problem.
I have a curl class, called Curl. Let's presume i have this code: $url
I know this is possible to be done using javascript, and I presume I
I want to make a sequence of in-memory operations atomic. I presume there is
So I presume this is a memory issue, here's the code: - (NSString *)giveMeAStringGoddammit
I presume this isn't a common problem, which makes it a bit more difficult
Is am using this: SetWindowsHookEx(WH_CALLWNDPROC, ...); I can see the messages I want to
I've used the CF Remote Performance Monitor , however this seems to only track
I presume this is possible? Basically i am receiving using LINQ (LINQ2Entities Entity Framework)
I presume this is a configuration error somewhere, but I can't figure out where.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.