Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 541799
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:22:49+00:00 2026-05-13T10:22:49+00:00

I probably didn’t ask correctly: I would like a list value that can match

  • 0

I probably didn’t ask correctly: I would like a list value that can match any list: the “inverse” of (None,)
but even with (None,) it will match item as None (which I don’t want)

The point is I have a function working with: [x for x in my_list if x[field] not in filter_list]

and I would like to filter everything or nothing without making tests like:
if filter_list==(None,): return [] and if filter_list==('*',): return my_list

PS: I wanted to simplify my question leading to some errors (list identifier) or stupid thing [x for x in x] 😉


Hi,

I need to do some filtering with list comprehension in python.

if I do something like that:

[x for x in list if x in (None,)]

I get rid of all values, which is fine

but I would like to have the same thing to match everything

I can do something like:

[x for x in list if x not in (None,)]

but it won’t be homogeneous with the rest

I tried some things but for example (True,) matches only 1

Note than the values to filter are numeric, but if you have something generic (like (None,) to match nothing), it would be great

Thanks
Louis

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:22:49+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:22 am

    __contains__ is the magic method that checks if something is in a sequence:

    class everything(object):
        def __contains__(self, _):
            return True           
    
    for x in (1,2,3):
        print x in everything()
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.