I proposed what I think is a better syntax for ASP.NET MVC views in this question. Since that question has been answered, I think my answer will generate little feedback, so I am posting it as its own question here.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I proposed what I think is a better syntax for ASP.NET MVC views in this question. Since that question has been answered, I think my answer will generate little feedback, so I am posting it as its own question here.
You’re on the right track, but I think you went too far. The balance is mixing the code with the html where it flows and not over complicating it and also not creating tag soup. The best view engine that I have found that does this is Spark.
Take a look at it and you will find it addresses what you are proposing in a more subtle and readable way.