Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4000780
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T07:49:26+00:00 2026-05-20T07:49:26+00:00

I ran a C program and got different output on different C compilers. Below

  • 0

I ran a C program and got different output on different C compilers. Below is
my program

void main()
{
    int i=5;
     printf("%d%d%d%d%d",i++,i--,++i,--i,i);
}

ON boarnland c++ complier o/p is

45545

and on gcc its

45555

is it really compiler dependent or its OS dependent?

The arguments in a function call are pushed into the stack from left to right. The evaluation is by popping out from the stack. and the evaluation is from right to left, hence the result.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T07:49:27+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 7:49 am

    You cannot rely on the order of execution of side effects to arguments to a function. In this case the 2 compilers are executing the side effects in a different order, producing different results.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I ran gprof on a C++ program that took 16.637s , according to time()
I'm trying to compile a program called ngrep, and when I ran configure, things
Ran across this line of code: FormsAuth = formsAuth ?? new FormsAuthenticationWrapper(); What do
I ran into an issue with an IIS web app shutting down an idle
I ran across this situation this afternoon, so I thought I'd ask what you
I ran into an interesting (and very frustrating) issue with the equals() method today
I ran across the following code in Ely Greenfield's SuperImage from his Book component
I ran into the problem that my primary key sequence is not in sync
I ran into an interesting behavior recently. It seems that if I override .equals()
I ran into a scenario where LINQ to SQL acts very strangely. I would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.