Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8841229
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T10:39:43+00:00 2026-06-14T10:39:43+00:00

I ran into a bug that manifested itself in IE8, but not in Firefox,

  • 0

I ran into a bug that manifested itself in IE8, but not in Firefox, Chrome or IE9+.

A snippet of code:

Date.prototype.ddmmyyyy = function() {
    var yyyy = this.getFullYear().toString();
    var mm = (this.getMonth()+1).toString();
    var dd = this.getDate().toString();
    return (dd[1]?dd:"0"+dd[0]) + '/' + (mm[1]?mm:"0"+mm[0]) + '/' + yyyy;
};

I won’t go into details explaining that it does (or tries to) which is blindingly obvious. I wasn’t aware that dd[0] and dd[1] would both return undefined in IE8.

What’s a better way to write the code? Or is there a way to make the string [/array] indexer work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T10:39:44+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 10:39 am

    You could modify your ternary statement to check the string’s length.

    dd.length > 1 ? dd : '0' + dd

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think i ran into a bug, it seems that EF is not handling
I ran into a bug in some code that extracts metadata from some text
I recently ran into a bug in my code when using boost::bind . From
I ran into a strange issue with tinyMCE that i was not able to
I ran into a bug I have trouble explaining. Now that I found the
I ran into what seemed a mysterious bug this morning that I feel very
I am new to C++ and ran into following supposedly bug, but somehow my
Premise I recently ran into a bug in a select statement in my code.
I ran into some similar questions on StackOverflow, tried the solutions, but did not
We ran into a bug in our product caused by the fact that for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.