Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8016075
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T20:26:25+00:00 2026-06-04T20:26:25+00:00

I ran into some (production!) code that looks like the snippet below: synchronized(some_object) {

  • 0

I ran into some (production!) code that looks like the snippet below:

synchronized(some_object) {
    some_object = new some_object()
}

I would expect this to be subject to all sorts of horrible race conditions, and that a second thread Could possibly enter this block one the new object is created. My Java chops aren’t good enough to state definitively the expected behavior of above, so curious what you folks have to say before I refactor this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T20:26:27+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    As Francis says, this may not be a problem. Your snippet is equivalent to this:

    SomeObject saved = some_object;
    synchronized(saved) {
      some_object = new SomeObject()
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Today, I ran into some code that goes like this. namespace Foo { public
I ran into a problem with some C code like this: struct SomeType {
I've recently ran into some code that checks Page.IsCallBack but I wasn't sure how
So I ran into a situation today where some production code was failing precisely
I ran into some code today that I found questionable. Here's a simplified example
I just ran into some code that overuse semicolons, or use semicolon for different
I was doing some performance metrics and I ran into something that seems quite
I ran into some Java code at work today : public interface A {
I ran into some singleton code today in our codebase and I wasn't sure
I recently ran into some issues with android.os.Bundle that I hoped to fix by

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.