Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 340047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T10:34:47+00:00 2026-05-12T10:34:47+00:00

I read a table with more than 1 million records from a database. It

  • 0

I read a table with more than 1 million records from a database. It takes 3 minutes until I have a populated object in memory. I wanted to optimize this process, and serialized this object to a file using binary BinaryFormatter. It created a file with 1/2 GB size. After I deserialized this file back to memory object. This took 11 minutes!

The question: why it’s much faster to read all these data from a database than from a file? Is it possible to optimize deserializing process somehow?

Database is on the same machine I did this test. None of other processes took CPU time at this time. CPU has 4 cores and there are 40 GB memory.

Edit: Code for deserializing:

    using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(filename, FileMode.Open))
    {
        var bf = new System.Runtime.Serialization.Formatters.Binary.BinaryFormatter();
        var data = (MyType)bf.Deserialize(fs);
        ...
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T10:34:48+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:34 am

    Because of the way the Binary Serializer works, it is painfully slow. It injects a lot of reflection-based metadata into the binary file. I ran some tests against some rather large structures a few years back and found that the XMLSerializer is both smaller and faster than the binary serializer. Go figure!

    In either case, the serialization is done via reflection, which is slow. You might consider your own serialization mechanism.

    I once created my own binary serialization mechanism (using file write/read), and it performed 20 times faster than the XML serializer, which performed faster than the binary serializer. It was also significantly smaller.

    You might want to consider doing something like that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 170k
  • Answers 170k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you mean you want to traverse the tree you… May 12, 2026 at 2:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your IDs are invalid - they're not allowed to start… May 12, 2026 at 2:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not sure what you mean by "maintain references"? I'm… May 12, 2026 at 2:01 pm

Related Questions

OK. I've read things here and there about SQL Server heaps, but nothing too
I have a simple domain class Licensee: @Entity @Table(name = LICENSEE) @Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE)
I'm working with Quickbook's IIF file format and I need to write a parser
I need to implement a multi-parented tree (or digraph) onto SQL Server 2005. I've

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.