Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7851723
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T19:15:03+00:00 2026-06-02T19:15:03+00:00

I read about R-Tree, kd-tree, bounding interval hierarchy etc for space-partitioning. I found that

  • 0

I read about R-Tree, kd-tree, bounding interval hierarchy etc for space-partitioning. I found that these data structures are useful for spatial querying. Although, they do partitioning, but I do not know how to retrieve those partitions from the data structure. So, my question boils down to “Given a number N and a map containing say X number of polygons, can I get N number of partitions that contain approximately equal number of polygons?”

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T19:15:04+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 7:15 pm

    Well, if you want exactly N partitions, any of the common bulk loading strategies for the R-Tree should work. It won’t necessarily be optimal, but you can force these to produce exactly N partitions of approximately equal size.

    The k-d-tree will have objects that are in neither the left nor the right side. But you can use the k-d-tree bulk loading strategy and modify it to produce N partitions. Another simple yet sometimes quite effective way of bulk-loading and R-tree, actually.

    When you constrain N to be a power of 2, or even better the dth power of some number, the splits will usually become better. So splitting a 3D dataset in 9 pages is much cleaner to implement than splitting it into 8 pages.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read about binary search trees that if it is a complete tree (all
Read about Server push here . I want to push data to client from
I read about an inheritance feature in PostgreSQL that seemed pretty neat. Unfortunately I
I have read several articles and several stackoverflow.com posts about expression tree. It is
I just read about the LLVM project and that it could be used to
Read about the issue in this stackoverflow question . Still have the same issue
I read about the Conditional attribute today. According to MSDN: Applying ConditionalAttribute to a
I read about using the CASE expression inside the WHERE clause here: http://scottelkin.com/sql/using-a-case-statement-in-a-sql-where-clause/ I'm
Ive read about it and to be honest it all seems like a bunch
I read about small talk being completely object oriented.. is C++ also completely object

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.